Shall we run toward the Light?

Shall we run toward the Light?

Monday, February 13, 2012

HBA

Dear Kenneth,
Unfortunately, there was an error in our decision delivery process, andadmission letters were accidentally sent to students who we cannot offeradmission to at this time. We sincerely apologize for this error, and we aresorry that we cannot currently offer you admission to HBA. However, we haveplaced you on our waiting list, and you will be given priority if a spacebecomes available.
Again, our sincerest apologies for any inconvenience this has caused.




This becomes increasingly annoying every time I read it.

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Shopping Week Blog

This is going up here so that I can delete the file.
Let it be noted that a lot of this stuff will not make sense to anyone other than myself.
Let it also be noted that I have censored myself by omitting extremely incriminating stuff. ;)


Monday, January 23, 2012
Econ 1010b--Macroeconomics
10:00am: Damn, Ec1010b lecture really got me interested in Econ again. Prof Foote was really interesting and inviting, super super funny.

Gov 40--International Conflict and Cooperation
10:06am: Looks like there are already people sucking up to Prof Rosen.
10:07am: Oh look, Matt Watson is here. As is Doris and Oh, John Grammer—never mind, not him. Ohai Julian.
10:07am: Oh, the suck-ups were actually just section leaders. Oops. #tooquicktojudge
10:08am: Class still hasn’t started… Oh well. :P Still giving out handouts… Oh lol, it’s just a syllabus.
10:10am: OHAI DIANA!
10:12am: A lot more sparse than Ec1010b
10:27am: Interesting insight about being able to look at current events based on historical parallels [Current “jihad” vs. Past European “crusade”]
10:32am: Also Japan-US in WWII vs. Iran-US&allies, with Econ Sanctions à War
10:37am: Maybe I’ll be more interested in a different IR class, or a PoliTheory class. Let’s see how Gov 1061 goes tomorrow.
10:51am: Ended 9 minutes early. Gives me good time to a) go to Sever and b) study for Chinese

Soc ???--something about heirachial organizations
11:10am: lol. People making fun of his accent already. Although, granted, it is difficult to understand him at times.
11:12am: Interesting, another Chinese TF
11:14am: lol, surprisingly high number of guest speakers—seven confirmed, hopefully nine?
11:17am: Ohai Jay. :P
11:18am: Lol. Holworthy freshman spouting out impressive things, just repeating the stuff the senior said, basically.
11:20am: Such a long course introduction.
11:58am: Indeed, the entire class, basically, was just course intro. Attempt to introduce material at the end involved readings that no one had done yet. Lol. Very awkward class, very awkward instructor, people left saying that they were “not feeling it” and those who do stay are probably hoping that the guest lectures and case studies will make up for it [as one girl mentioned]

Ec10 2nd Semester - Macroeconomics
12:07am: Mankiw. First comic: “This is my first recession. How worried should I be? / You’ll be fine as long as you don’t have any hopes and dreams. / But I still have them. / It’s time to yank off that band-aid.” WTF.

Psych ??? - The Psychology of Human Sexuality
1:08pm: Let’s hope this class is offered next year since it hasn’t been for 5 years, lol.
1:11pm: I am SOOOOOOOOO IMMATURE.
1:14pm: “Human beings are always…’up’ for it.”
1:20pm: Highlights—Silvio Berlusconi, Herman Cain, Good ol’ Newt, and hypocritical old closeted Republican men
1:22pm: Too much talk of the female anatomy
1:26pm: “biopsychosocial perspective” <3
1:27pm: “fisting” “titillating”
1:31pm: Interesting distinction between transvestite and transsexual; the former is more of a fetish, the latter psychological/gender identity.
1:44pm: “Based on this research, exposure to semen lowers rates of clinical depression.”
1:49pm: Noice. He’s writing a textbook. AND he writes a SEX COLUMN?! scienceofrelationships.com: “Lusting, Loving, Leaving”

Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Gov 1061--The History of Modern Political Philosophy
11:23am: Ohai Krister.
11:40am: obai Krister.
12:05pm: Ohai again, Krister.

Eng??? - Crime and Horror in Victorian Literature
12:07pm: Lol, cheesy music.
12:10pm: How does he use “Exciting” and “Disturbing” in the same sentence?

Ec????--Behavioral Economics
1:08pm: Lol. Kids not looking at the location change [although to be honest, it wasn’t very clear on the course website.]
1:12pm: Yay. Harvard students solving problems on their own. The horde is trickling in.

SLS 20--Psychological Science
2:35pm: Lol—Amboy Duke’s “Journey to the Center of The Mind” not working on Pinker’s laptop. Sadfaice.
2:39pm: His voice is higher than I would have expected. But his sense of humor is nice
2:44pm: Steven Pinker talking to his complaining [battery-dead] Roomba
3:13pm: Steven Pinker just mentioned Viagra and penis enlargement in conjunction with captcha tests
3:37pm: Noticing a lot of overlap with his book
3:48pm: I like how he says “rather” as [ɹɒðə]


AAAAAAAAAAAAND that's a wrap.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Winter Crush

Didn't exactly work out the way I expected.
Indeed, to be completely honest, didn't really work out at all.

We had started messaging each other at the end of last semester, right before finals. The nice (if you could call it that) coincidence was that we had exams the same days--indeed, we shared one exam. But even post-exam period, when we had gone home for the holidays, the messages continued to flow. Most of the time, I wasn't the one initiating them. Regardless, I looked forward to them every night. It was funny--I'd get the messages around 11pm or 12am, when it was already 1-2am on the East Coast. But we would always be chatting for an hour, maybe half, maybe more.

The messages dried up after New Years. I reasoned that it was difficult to enjoy a trip to South Africa and Germany and still find time to text someone back in the States, nine time zones away. Even when messages weren't forthcoming after the trip, I just assumed it was because it was almost time to get back to campus, and everyone was just busy packing.

So it was a little unfortunate when we couldn't exchange over ten words to each other when we finally met up on campus. If we can even call it that. The first two times we met eyes, a total of zero words were spoken. The third time? "Hey." "Oh! Hi!" And then we parted ways.

A few nights later, around 3am when words just start spilling directly from my brain into the world, I sent a message: "Would you like to go for coffee on Friday?" I even gave times when I was available, times on other days if Friday didn't exactly work out. Twenty four hours later, there was still no word. It wasn't until the day after that, when we were chatting about the mundane topic of classes (a conversation that I had started up, albeit on Facebook--as usual), I snuck in a strategic, "So is Friday a no-go?" The answer was as expected.

For a while, I hoped that we may take the same class. We were shopping the same government class, and we met up at a meeting for the Harvard Political Review. Both of us are planning to write articles for the publication, and from the way things look now it seems pretty plausible that we'll be seeing each other at least once a week, in the meeting room. Part of me still wants to break the barrier, to strike up conversation, and perhaps to re-extend that coffee offer. But part of me--a part that's been nagging all along, a part that has compared our intellects and found mine to be far inferior, a part that constantly scolded the overjoyed side of me throughout those few weeks of "attraction"--that part knows that it'll probably come to nothing.

And that's where we stand right now.
And though it had never really had the time to grow into anything in the first place, there's still a sinking feeling when I realize that the "seed" hidden "far beneath the bitter snows" is perpetually frozen, never to make it to the Spring.
#BetteMidler #ohgod #sosappy #thisisneithertwitternortumblrwhyhashtags


Speaking of tumblr... Some recent posts in which I wallow in self-pity:
http://kenmeows.tumblr.com/post/16807201285/simplementconfondu-accurate-if-i-were
simplementconfondu:

accurate.

If I were &#8220;Person A&#8221;, there would be no arrow on the left hand side.
#onesidedrelationships

http://kenmeows.tumblr.com/post/16852920227



Aaaaaaaand we're done.

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Tiger Mom

“I value cosmopolitanism, and to make sure the girls are exposed to different cultures, Jed and I have always taken them with us everywhere we traveled—even though, whenthe girls were little, we sometimes had to sleep in one bed to make it affordable. As a result, by the time they were twelve and nine, the girls had been to London, Paris, Nice, Rome, Venice, Milan, Amsterdam, the Hague, Barcelona, Madrid, Málaga, Lichtenstein, Monaco, Munich, Dublin, Brussels, Bruges, Strasbourg, Beijing, Shanghai, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Manila, Istanbul, Mexico City, Cancún, Buenos Aires, Santiago, Rio de Janeiro, São Paolo, La Paz, Sucre, Cochambamba, Jamaica, Tangier, Fez, Johannesburg, Cape Town, and the Rock of Gibraltar.” Amy Chua, Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, pg 86-87.
In my eighteen years of life, I’ve been to Los Angeles, San Diego, Seattle, Las Vegas, Vancouver, Boston, New York, Ithaca [lol], Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Heyuan, and Beijing. Under 15 places in 18 years, compared to almost 40 in 12 or 9 years—and those are just the cities OUTSIDE the U.S.
When I’m reading Amy Chua’s book, the feelings I experience are somewhat…complex. I’m surely not reading it and seeing anything particularly shocking; indeed, her conduct is that which I expect from a strict, traditional, Asian mother.
A fact that struck me as particularly interesting was that a) Chua is probably as old as my mother and father; all three were born in the Year of the Tiger in 1962 [indeed, she’s a month younger than my dad] and b) Sophia is the same age as I am. And yet, reading about her, she is clearly much more talented, much more motivated, and much more adept at a variety of subjects and disciplines than I could ever imagine being.
My dad is definitely Western by Chua’s definitions—he’s fairly lax and allows us to do as we wish, because he believes that ultimately it’s up to us to forge our own way through life. The only Chinese-styled parenting I see from him is his [rightful] refusal to praise us in public—or even at home, sometimes. My mother is comparatively more traditional. I sometimes think that she would have liked to be a tiger mom, and given better work and living circumstances, I’m sure she would have followed in Chua’s footsteps. At the moment, she’s reading the Chinese version of the book [which I thoughtfully bought for my parents as a Christmas present] and exclaiming that she was never as harsh as Chua, and now she cites excerpts as justification for things like prohibiting sleepovers.
When I’m reading this, I wonder if the reason I’m so mediocre—in math, in music, in Chinese, in everything—is because my parents didn’t have the time (or the heart) to drill me as hard as Chua did with her daughters. Compared to many people—including many of my thoroughly Western classmates both at Harvard and in high school—I’m very unmotivated, lazy, stupid. I’m not very good at my passion of learning languages because, as my attempt to excuse myself goes, I’m just naturally bad at memorizing vocab. But sometimes, I wonder if it’s just because I’m being far too easy on myself. If I just drill myself, if I do more rote memorization, if I practice my strokes in Chinese and my conjugations in Spanish and French, German and Italian, could I not reach the same level of competency and fluency as someone like Krister could?
And then there are times when I reminisce about missed opportunities. My only formal piano lessons happened when I was seven years old. Even then, my lessons weren’t one-on-one; they occurred at the teacher’s house, where he taught classes of 15 or so kids really, really basic tunes. The extent of practice I put in at home was practically negligible. Right now, I’m seeing the same pattern of practice [or rather, lack thereof] in my sister, albeit with the violin. Her report card for Orchestra came home as merely “Satisfactory”, the middle grade, rather than “Outstanding”. The key reason, I suspect, is because of her lack of at home practice (duly noted on the report card) and the lack of any real improvement (also noted on said report card). And despite my attempts to tell her to practice [“You need to do at least half an hour every day you don’t have Orchestra”—a feat insanely dwarfed by Lulu and Sophia’s schedules] she never does it, and I, supposedly lost in my own “busy” [selfish] life, never follow through.
When I read the part about the three-generation deterioration of the Chinese immigrant family, something immediately stuck out to me. Even though I belonged to the second generation—aka Amy Chua’s generation, the first generation American—I identified more with the third generation. Sure, I’m relatively disciplined, and I’m attending an Ivy League—but at the same time, I’m extremely privileged, extremely pampered, and extremely lazy and un-self-motivated. And when I read that, I think, would I have turned out differently had my parents been Chua’s stereotypical strict immigrant parents? Would my possibly innate talents in language and other fields have blossomed more rapidly, more perfectly? And most of all, would I be more confident in myself?
Of course, I’m grateful for the freedoms I have. I’m allowed to do basically anything I want. My father said today that he will support me whatever major I declare, as long as it’s something I enjoy. And my mother has compromised by saying that psychology, at least, might be somewhat useful and lucrative [she’s still intent on me eventually obtaining a law and/or business degree, because “You’re going to Harvard, after all. Why not study the thing that Harvard’s best at? Study law!”]. But part of me wonders if the reason I can’t imagine living without these privileges is due to the fact that I’ve never had to live without them, that I’ve never really been forced to do something that I didn’t want to, that I’ve never been deprived of them—and I wonder if that in turn has deprived me of some other opportunities.
Oh well. Thoughts, thoughts. Ultimately, I try to minimize the influence that Tiger Chua is having on my own hibernating-Tiger mom, telling her that “Yes, she did do those things, and she didn’t allow her daughters to do those other things, but in the end, she says she regrets a lot! Just read on!” Truthfully, I don’t remember if Chua admits to being regretful at all—after all, both daughters turned out wonderful. And the most ironic part of it is that I myself show Tiger tendencies when I scold my sister. Indeed, already I can imagine being a Tiger Dad myself—drilling in classical music [piano and/or some sort of orchestral instrument, stringed or woodwind], finding tutors in foreign languages [Chinese at a minimum, hopefully Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Catalan, German, Japanese, Arabic, Farsi, Russian, Latin, and Greek; in short, the few languages that I myself want to master eventually.], and tons tons tons of math, reading, and writing practice. I want kids who will get perfect 2400s on the SAT and 36s on the ACT (feats that I myself was unable to accomplish)—all while probably married to a skeptical Westerner (hopefully at least one who actually wants children).
In short, I admire Amy Chua. I certainly think that she’s far too strict, and right now I wouldn’t want her controlling my life. But her ability to stay strong and maintain ground in front of the children she loves—that, at least, is a trait to be admired.
Alright, time to get back to reading.

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Glee 12/13/11

Gah.. So much love for this episode.

I'd seen the music for the episode online already, through Spotify and stuff. Wasn't sure that they were actually doing a Christmas episode or if the Christmas album thing had just become an annual money-making device. So glad that they actually shot the episode. :)
I have to admit, I was a little worried when it started off with Mariah Carey. But it wasn't bad. Sure, a lot of unrealistic things, like Artie almost rejecting to shoot the thing and the TV guy being glad about having a high schooler shoot the Christmas Special. I mean, really? But there were a lot of pros that balanced it out.
Top on my list, I guess, is Sue being human. It happens so rarely, and often it's so weird and abrupt. But, good Sue always makes an appearance when her sister is involved, and by mentioning her, it was a lot more realistic.
Then, the Christmas Special itself was really good. I was loving the black-and-white; made it feel much more oldies, which helped make the affectations that Kurt and Rachel took on funny, rather than indications of bad acting. That first scene, with just Kurt and Blaine, was also super great. Kurt/Blaine Holiday duets are so great. :) And their suits! Gosh, so much love for those suits, not to mention Kurt's skinny tie (nothing against Blaine/Darren's bowties, but I really love the skinny ties).
But yeah. I'm glad that it showed them (the kids) not being super douchebags. At least they helped at the homeless shelter after shooting the Special [although I would have imagined them shooting the special with the homeless shelter as the setting so that they could actually watch, but whatevs]. And though I found the reading of scripture a little uncomfortable (so many Jewish characters present!) it was great and I understood the message being shared. And so, apparently, did the characters.



So yeah. I'm happy. Done with finals, taking a short break around here first before I head back to the Valley. Most of my friends here have gone home, save Jon. Mostly, just glad to be able to relax. Can't wait to spend time home with friends and family.
Ah, the holiday season. :)